<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Web1Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://web1media.com/wm/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://web1media.com/wm</link>
	<description>Online Marketing &#38; SEO Experts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 01:20:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to Get High-Quality Low-Cost Images for Your Website by Daniel Padavona</title>
		<link>http://web1media.com/wm/2011/03/how-to-get-high-quality-low-cost-images-for-your-website/comment-page-1/#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Padavona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 01:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web1media.com/wm/?p=177#comment-128</guid>
		<description>This is an excellent article.  Free images are generally worth their price, but you can step up to very high quality images for a few dollars (blog size) or about $15 (high res).  As I wrote recently in my own blog, playing it as cheaply as possible often leads to a poor impression of you by your visitors or customers.  

Also consider indie stock websites.  Many of the best photographers from the leading stock agencies are now selling on their own.  And like any other business, cutting out the middleman (agency) leads to cost savings for buyers.  Plus you are buying from the best photographers, so you will see far fewer low quality images than you have to deal with at the large agencies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an excellent article.  Free images are generally worth their price, but you can step up to very high quality images for a few dollars (blog size) or about $15 (high res).  As I wrote recently in my own blog, playing it as cheaply as possible often leads to a poor impression of you by your visitors or customers.  </p>
<p>Also consider indie stock websites.  Many of the best photographers from the leading stock agencies are now selling on their own.  And like any other business, cutting out the middleman (agency) leads to cost savings for buyers.  Plus you are buying from the best photographers, so you will see far fewer low quality images than you have to deal with at the large agencies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

